Does the language in subdivision (a)(2) of the California Government Code need to be interpreted differently than it was originally interpreted?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Allen, 106 Cal.Rptr.2d 253, 88 Cal.App.4th 986 (Cal. App. 2001):
Since the language in subdivision (a)(2) was derived from former Government Code section 13967, we may look to the interpretation of that language when it was part of that former section. (See People v. Heitzman, supra, 9 Cal.4th at pp. 204-205.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does section 654, subdivision (a) of the California Criminal Code apply to punish an act or omission that is punishable by different provisions of the law in different ways? (California, United States of America)
What is the facial constitutionality of the section 17556 (d) of California Government Code 17556, subdivision (d), section 726 of the California Tax Code, providing that a local authority has authority to levy fees on behalf of a third party? (California, United States of America)
Does Section 654, subdivision (a) of the California Criminal Code apply to punish an act or omission that is punishable in different ways by different sections of the law? (California, United States of America)
How has the California Supreme Court interpreted statutory interpretation in the context of the California Family Law Act? (California, United States of America)
Does the language in Section 288, subdivision (b) of the California Criminal Code, which refers to force, need to be interpreted as "force"? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for interpretation of the California Code of Civil Procedure when it comes to the interpretation of statutory interpretation? (California, United States of America)
Does the rule against interpreting statutory language "in a manner that would render some part of the statute surplusage" support a different interpretation? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the language of section 1170.12, subdivision (b)(1)(B) of the California Penal Code? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the language of section 496, subdivision (a) of the California Criminal Code, when a defendant is convicted of theft but not of concealing or withholding the same property? (California, United States of America)
What is the difference between Section 667.5, subdivision (b) of the California Criminal Code and section 667, subdivision 5, of the Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
