Does the fact that a statute can be applied in situations not expressly anticipated by the Legislature demonstrate ambiguity?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Siskiyou Cnty. Farm Bureau v. Dep't of Fish & Wildlife, 188 Cal.Rptr.3d 141, 237 Cal.App.4th 411 (Cal. App. 2015):
Moreover, the fact that a statute can be applied in situations not expressly anticipated by [the Legislature] does not demonstrate ambiguity. It demonstrates breadth. (Estate of Earley (2009) 173 Cal.App.4th 369, 376, 92 Cal.Rptr.3d 577 ; see Souza v. Lauppe (1997) 59 Cal.App.4th 865, 873-874, 69 Cal.Rptr.2d 494.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does the general rule that an ambiguous taxing statute must be construed strictly in favour of the taxpayer apply only to administrative interpretations of the ambiguous tax statutes? (California, United States of America)
Does a federal decision construing a state forfeiture statute apply the same weight and authority as it applies to a federal forfeiture statute? (California, United States of America)
Is a later, more specific statute controlling over an earlier statute, even though the later statute would by its terms cover the present situation? (California, United States of America)
Does the presumption against retroactivity apply to a statute that is ambiguous about retroactive application? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a person is "similarly situated" in a situation that affects two or more similarly situated groups? (California, United States of America)
How does a statute that is ambiguous on retroactive application apply? (California, United States of America)
Can a small possibility of a statute arguably being applied to protected conduct be invalidated or speculative restriction of the statute? (California, United States of America)
When harmonizing two statutes relating to the same subject, can a particular or specific statute take precedence over a conflicting general statute? (California, United States of America)
Does the statute of limitations apply to medical malpractice actions? (California, United States of America)
Does the ex post facto clause in the California Criminal Code apply to a judicial construction of a criminal statute that is unexpected and indefensible? (California, United States of America)
