California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Bank of Am., N.A. v. Roberts, F064109 (Cal. App. 2013):
presumption against retroactivity; rather '"a statute that is ambiguous with respect to retroactive application is construed ... to be unambiguously prospective."' [Citations.]" (Quarry v. Doe I (2012) 53 Cal.4th 945, 955; see also 3 ["No part of [this code] is retroactive, unless expressly so declared."].)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.