California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Buycks, S231765, S232900, S238888 (Cal. 2018):
unless it is very clear from extrinsic sources that the [lawmakers] . . . must have intended a retroactive application.' [Citations.] Accordingly, ' "a statute that is ambiguous with respect to retroactive application is construed . . . to be unambiguously prospective." ' " (People v. Brown (2012) 54 Cal.4th 314, 324.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.