Does the definition of reasonable doubt in Cal.C.CRCRIM No. 220, 220, give rise to a claim that it does not properly define reasonable doubt?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Song Vang, C058461 (Cal. App. 2/18/2010), C058461. (Cal. App. 2010):
Defendant contends that CALCRIM No. 220, given in this case, does not correctly define reasonable doubt. In his reply brief, defendant acknowledges that in People v. Guerrero (2007) 155 Cal.App.4th 1264, we rejected this claim, but states he wishes to preserve it for federal review. We adhere to our view that the instruction is correct.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is the reasonable doubt instruction insufficient to support the definition of reasonable doubt in CALCRIM No. 220? (California, United States of America)
Does the absence of an instruction defining reasonable doubt result in a jury failing to apply the same reasonable doubt test? (California, United States of America)
Does the absence of lingering doubt from a recitation of evidence the defense offered in an attempt to raise reasonable doubt raise a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
Is the reasonable doubt instruction insufficient to support the definition of reasonable doubt in CALCRIM No. 220? (California, United States of America)
Does the doctrine of reasonable doubt apply to a defendant's due process right to appeal against a jury verdict that diminished the prosecution's burden to prove beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for reasonable likelihood of a claim under the Chapman v. Chapman "harmless beyond a reasonable doubt" standard? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a reasonable probability of a more favourable result under the reasonable beyond reasonable doubt standard? (California, United States of America)
Is there any reasonable doubt that there would have been no reasonable doubt in a jury finding a defendant guilty absent the error? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for misconduct in a criminal case where a prosecutor argued that reasonable doubt was not a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
Are instructions to the jury in a state criminal trial that merely omit a proper description of the requirement of proof of every element of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
