Does the cumulative impact of water discharges need to be considered in the environmental impact review?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Coal. for Adequate Review v. City of S.F., A131487 (Cal. App. 2013):
impact to analyze. Thus there is no cumulative impacts shortcoming in the EIR on this basis. (Citizens for East Shore Parks v. State Lands Com., supra, 202 Cal.App.4th at pp. 565-566 ["the EIR did not need to consider the cumulative impact of [water] discharges because they were not 'effects of [the] individual project' under consideration"].)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for discussing the cumulative impact of a project in an environmental review? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard for further environmental review under section 15168 of the California Environmental Review Act? (California, United States of America)
What are the consequences of a deficient Environmental Impact Review? (California, United States of America)
If defendant fails to establish all the errors of the trial court as a cumulative result of the cumulative error, can he continue to argue that the cumulative effect of the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt and mandates reversal? (California, United States of America)
Can a prosecutor make an argument that imploring the jury to consider the impact of the crime's impact on the victim's family? (California, United States of America)
Is a motion to discharge an appointed attorney reviewed or reviewed? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for an Environmental Impact Review? (California, United States of America)
What is the scope of the environmental impact review (EIR) required by the California Department of Environment? (California, United States of America)
What is the cumulative effect of errors found by the Court of Appeal when considering cumulative effect? (California, United States of America)
Does a review court need to consider arguments not advanced in the trial, not in the opinion of the Review Court? (California, United States of America)
