Does a review court need to consider arguments not advanced in the trial, not in the opinion of the Review Court?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from D.P. v. Angeles, D068978 (Cal. App. 2016):
8. To the extent Father now seeks to rely on purported HIPAA violations in support of this argument, he did not raise any such allegations before the trial court and we decline to consider them now. (See DiCola v. White Brothers Performance Products, Inc. (2008) 158 Cal.App.4th 666, 676 [reviewing court need not consider arguments not advanced in the trial court].)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
On appeal, can the court conduct an independent review of the transcript of the in camera hearing and the records reviewed by the trial court to determine whether any records were improperly withheld? (California, United States of America)
Does a reviewing court have to rely on the opinion of the trial court before making a decision? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant makes a mid-trial motion to revoke his self represented status and have standby counsel appointed for the remainder of the trial, does the trial court have a duty to manage the trial? (California, United States of America)
When reviewing a challenge to a suppression ruling, how does the Court of Appeal review the factual findings of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
Does counsel who fail to respond when given the chance to respond to arguments in an adversarial context deprive the trial court of the opportunity to consider their arguments in a similar context? (California, United States of America)
How have courts considered the argument that the trial court erred in failing to conduct an in camera hearing? (California, United States of America)
Does counsel who fail to respond when given the chance to respond to arguments in an adversarial context deprive the trial court of the opportunity to consider their arguments in a similar context? (California, United States of America)
In a sexual assault case, in what circumstances would the jury have considered a defense counsel's closing argument that the prosecutor's rebuttal to the closing argument had the trial court sustained an objection? (California, United States of America)
Can a reviewing court substitute its opinion for that of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
In reviewing an order denying a motion to suppress, does the court have any authority to review the fact finding of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
