Is a motion to discharge an appointed attorney reviewed or reviewed?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Jones, C082146 (Cal. App. 2017):
Defendant filed a supplemental brief. He claims the motion he brought in the trial court to discharge his appointed attorney (People v. Marsden (1970) 2 Cal.3d 118 (Marsden)) should be reviewed, suggesting the trial court abused its discretion in denying his motion.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Can a defendant personally raise the issue of ineffective assistance of counsel by bringing a motion to discharge his attorney and appoint a new attorney? (California, United States of America)
What is the impact of a motion to amend a motion in the Superior Court of Appeal against a motion by a defendant who alleges that the motion was improperly adjourned? (California, United States of America)
How should the Court of Appeal review the first-stage ruling of a motion to review the denial of Batson/Wheeler motion? (California, United States of America)
In reviewing a ruling on an anti-SLAPP motion, how do we review an order granting or denying a motion to strike under section 425.16 de novo? (California, United States of America)
Is a client's attorney required to repay all moneys laid out by the attorney to the attorney before the client can make a claim against the attorney? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a judge to determine whether or not to grant a motion for judicial review of a motion requiring a judicial review? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a motion to discharge a court appointed attorney? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a motion to discharge a court-appointed attorney? (California, United States of America)
Is appellant's contention that he would rather be able to represent himself rather than rely upon an attorney appointed by his appointed attorney without consulting the court? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant has appointed a new attorney to investigate a claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel, is the proper procedure to substitute a new appointed attorney for all purposes? (California, United States of America)
