Does the Court need to consider arguments raised for the first time at oral argument?

How has the California Supreme Court considered the constitutionality of the California S.S.A.B.C.L.A Code of Civil Procedure when it is raised for the first time? (California, United States of America)

Does a review court need to consider arguments not advanced in the trial, not in the opinion of the Review Court? (California, United States of America)

Can a question raised for the first time by an amicus curiae be considered before the Court of Appeal? (California, United States of America)

How have courts considered the argument that the trial court erred in failing to conduct an in camera hearing? (California, United States of America)

Does counsel who fail to respond when given the chance to respond to arguments in an adversarial context deprive the trial court of the opportunity to consider their arguments in a similar context? (California, United States of America)

In what circumstances will the Court of Appeal consider an issue raised in a reply brief of an appellant before the reviewing court? (California, United States of America)

In a sexual assault case, in what circumstances would the jury have considered a defense counsel's closing argument that the prosecutor's rebuttal to the closing argument had the trial court sustained an objection? (California, United States of America)

How have courts considered a Defendant's argument in his reply brief that the first shot was proof of intent to kill? (California, United States of America)

Does counsel who fail to respond when given the chance to respond to arguments in an adversarial context deprive the trial court of the opportunity to consider their arguments in a similar context? (California, United States of America)

How have courts considered the importance of privacy rights in the context of First Amendment and First Privacy Rights? (California, United States of America)