Does the court err by dismissing all of Ng's in-forma pauperis claims?

Because no federal claims remained, the district court did not err by dismissing Ng's state law claims. See Notrica v. Board of Supervisors, 925 F.2d 1211, 1213-14 (9th Cir.1991).

Because Ng did not establish the likelihood of success on the merits or the exceptional complexity of the issues, the district court did not err by denying his motion for appointment of counsel. See Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir.1991).

The district court did not err by revoking Ng's in forma pauperis status when the record establishes that Ng owns property not listed in his application for in forma pauperis status. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(d); O'Loughlin v. Doe, 920 F.2d 614, 617 (9th Cir.1990).