Does the Attorney General have any concerns that the trial court did not apply the correct standard of conduct in the context of Section 47 of the California Civil Code?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Mitchell, A133094 (Cal. App. 2014):
The Attorney General insists that the trial court did not apply the wrong standard, noting that "the trial court is presumed to have known and applied the correct statutory and case law in the exercise of its official duties." (People v. Mack (1986) 178 Cal.App.3d 1026, 1032; Evid. Code 664.) The record certainly shows the court knew
Page 47
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does Section 1054(1) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure, section 1054 et. seq. and section 854 of the Criminal Code, allow defense counsel to conduct their investigation and prepare for trial? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 139 of the California Civil Code, section 139 2 of the S.C. Code of Civil Procedure? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General's sentencing error under section 667.5, subdivision (a) of the California Criminal Code apply to recidivism enhancements under sections 667 and 667 of the Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the California Civil Code section 1714 of the Civil Code apply to an individual who has been denied a right to claim damages under the Civil Procedure Act? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant be found to have committed a single physical act for purposes of section 654 of the California Criminal Code, Section 215 of the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 422 of the Criminal Code for carjacking? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review applied by the courts in determining whether a section of the California Civil Code is unconstitutional? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General have forfeited a contention of substantial rights under section 1259 of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure Act? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for Section 654 of the California Criminal Code when a defendant is found guilty of a breach of section 654 or section 744 of the Code of Civil Procedure? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 1016.5 of the California Immigration Code and how have the courts interpreted the word 'court' in that section? (California, United States of America)
In a contract impairment case arising out of section 340.9(1) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure Act, is there any case law where the court has found that the provision does not apply to all cases? (California, United States of America)
