Does the anti-SLAPP statute protect the right to petition before courts and administrative bodies?

In reviewing the severity of discipline imposed by an administrative body in a mandamus proceeding, does the court need to consider the correctness of the decision of the administrative agency rather than that of the trial court? (California, United States of America)

Is Respondent's petition against appellant a mixed protected and non-protected petition? (California, United States of America)

Does the anti-SLAPP statute protect a person's right of petition or free speech? (California, United States of America)

Does the anti-SLAPP statute insulate defendants from any liability for claims arising from the protected rights of petition or speech? (California, United States of America)

Does the anti-SLAPP statute bar a plaintiff from bringing a motion to strike a claim for damages arising from a protected right of speech and petition? (California, United States of America)

Does the Court of Appeal have jurisdiction to deny without prejudice a habeas corpus petition from a defendant who has not filed a petition in the proper lower court? (California, United States of America)

What is the role of an appellate court in reviewing a school disciplinary decision on a petition for writ of administrative mandamus? (California, United States of America)

Does the Court of Appeal have found that Defendant Joiner did not waive his assumed constitutional right to be personally present at the remand hearing and that the court erred in conducting that hearing in his absence? (California, United States of America)

Is the right of petition protected in the same way as free speech? (California, United States of America)

Does a nonconstitutional administrative agency, during quasijudicial administrative proceedings, lack authority to determine the constitutionality of a statute? (California, United States of America)