California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Emerson v. Powers, 2d Civil No. B269529 (Cal. App. 2016):
Furthermore, notwithstanding appellant's argument to the contrary, respondent's petition is not based on mixed protected and non-protected activity. (See Baral v. Schnitt (2016) 1 Cal.5th 376, 392 ["But when the defendant seeks to strike particular claims supported by allegations of protected activity that appear alongside other claims within a single cause of action, the motion cannot be defeated by showing a likelihood of success on the claims arising from unprotected activity"].) The petition arises entirely from appellant's unprotected activities.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.