Does Section 204 of the California Labor Code, section 204(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure, allow for personal injury damages to be sustained in a personal injury case?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Jakiel v. Impresa Aerospace, LLC, B261175, B264508 (Cal. App. 2017):
negates the necessary element of damages. (See, e.g., Auerbach v. Great Western Bank (1999) 74 Cal.App.4th 1172, 1185; see also Lueras v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP (2013) 221 Cal.App.4th 49, 55-56.)
E. Labor Code Section 204
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does Section 1054(1) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure, section 1054 et. seq. and section 854 of the Criminal Code, allow defense counsel to conduct their investigation and prepare for trial? (California, United States of America)
What are the implications of section 12965, subdivision (b) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure for the purpose of paying attorney fees in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant be found to have committed a single physical act for purposes of section 654 of the California Criminal Code, Section 215 of the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 422 of the Criminal Code for carjacking? (California, United States of America)
Does section 1108 of the California Code of Civil Procedure, section 1101, subdivision (a) of the Criminal Code, allow for "propensity" evidence in sexual assault cases? (California, United States of America)
What is the effect of section 352 of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure Guidelines on the exclusion of evidence in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
In a contract impairment case arising out of section 340.9(1) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure Act, is there any case law where the court has found that the provision does not apply to all cases? (California, United States of America)
In a contract impairment case arising out of section 340.9(1) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure Act, is there any case law where the court has found that the provision does not apply to all cases? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the California Civil Code section 1714 of the Civil Code apply to an individual who has been denied a right to claim damages under the Civil Procedure Act? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for Section 654 of the California Criminal Code when a defendant is found guilty of a breach of section 654 or section 744 of the Code of Civil Procedure? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 139 of the California Civil Code, section 139 2 of the S.C. Code of Civil Procedure? (California, United States of America)
