The following excerpt is from Reliance Ins. Co. v. Lipke, 927 F.2d 610 (9th Cir. 1991):
1 Alternatively, we have held that Rule 58 requires the filing of a separate document with respect to a final judgement, and not to an order denying a Rule 59 motion for new trial. See Hollywood v. City of Santa Maria, 886 F.2d 1228, 1231 (9th Cir.1989). While this opinion concerned a Rule 59 motion, the reasoning behind this decision applies similarly to the present case. However, as we find that a separate judgement was actually filed we need not reach this issue.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.