The following excerpt is from Interlabservice v. Illumina, Inc., Case No.: 15cv2171-KSC (S.D. Cal. 2017):
properly denied because "additional discovery would have to be undertaken" on new claims that advanced "different legal theories and require[d] proof of different facts"); Johnson v. Mammoth, 975 F.2d at 607-610 (affirming denial of motion to amend filed after the deadline without a showing of good cause to modify the deadline in the pre-trial scheduling order).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.