The following excerpt is from Tribal Village of Akutan v. Hodel, 859 F.2d 651 (9th Cir. 1988):
This analysis is in accord with neither the statutory language nor our precedents. The plain language of section 19 limits the court to reviewing the rationality of the Secretary's determination; the court cannot "substitute its judgment for that of the [Secretary]." California v. Watt, 683 F.2d at 1269 (dismissing a similar argument that the Secretary must accept the governor's recommendations if they "provided for a reasonable balance between national and state interests," id. at 1268). Even if we agreed that the Governor's recommendations were reasonable, we could not conclude the Secretary was arbitrary or capricious simply because he chose to reject them.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.