Does a mandatory sex registration requirement under section 290.012 and 290.013, as applied to appellant violate his due process rights?

Defendant also argues that the "mandatory sex registration requirement under sections 290.012 and 290.013, as applied to appellant, violates appellant's due process rights to be free from arbitrary and oppressive official enforcement action." Defendant cites People v. North (2003) 112 Cal.App.4th 621, but this case does not support his position. In North, a transient sex offender argued that registration obligations requiring him to inform authorities every time he changed "location" were too vague to allow compliance, and therefore violated his due process rights.

Page 12