Does a brief cross-examination challenged by appellant in a civil case violate the appellant's constitutional due process rights?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Chaparro-Esquivel, A145665 (Cal. App. 2017):
2. The brief cross-examination challenged by appellant did not violate appellant's constitutional due process rights. (People v. Partida (2005) 37 Cal.4th 428, 439 ["[T]he admission of evidence, even if erroneous under state law, results in a due process violation only if it makes the trial fundamentally unfair."].)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for a demurrer to deny or deny a plaintiff's civil rights claim against a civil servant who allegedly participated in civil rights violations? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the Supreme Court strike down a section of the Civil Rights Act that prohibits the use of certain types of civil rights, such as civil liberties, as well as those of the individual, in the context of civil liberties? (California, United States of America)
Does a statutory violation of Section 10 of the Civil Code of Civil Procedure constitute a violation of due process and a failure to render effective assistance of counsel? (California, United States of America)
Does the admission of evidence in a civil case of criminal proceedings against Fuentes violate his federal constitutional right to exercise his right to privacy? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted "the people's right to due process" not to include the right to compel the press to supply unpublished information obtained in the newsgathering process? (California, United States of America)
Does a prosecutor who makes a statement before a jury that touches on one defendant's right to silence and representation constitute a constitutional violation? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant be convicted of violating section 148(a)(1) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure if the jury found a completed violation of section 148 prior to the officers' use of excessive force? (California, United States of America)
Is there a constitutional right to seek and enforce a right of equal protection and due process? (California, United States of America)
Does a failure of instruction to require a jury to produce written findings by the jury regarding the aggravating factors found and considered in returning a death sentence violate a defendant's constitutional right to meaningful appellate review? (California, United States of America)
Does a mandatory sex registration requirement under section 290.012 and 290.013, as applied to appellant violate his due process rights? (California, United States of America)
