Does section 1109 of the Federal and State constitutions violate a defendant's right to due process?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Perez, D073137 (Cal. App. 2019):
Cal.App.4th 1301, 1310 [constitutionality of section 1109 under due process clauses of federal and state constitutions "has now been settled"]; People v. Johnson (2000) 77 Cal.App.4th 410, 420 [section 1109 does not violate defendant's right to due process].) We likewise reject the argument.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Can a defendant recast his claim for a federal due process violation as a federal violation of his right to associate with others? (California, United States of America)
Does a prosecutor's comments about sexual assault violate a defendant's federal and state constitutional rights? (California, United States of America)
Does the application of "ordinary rules of evidence" such as section 352 of California Evidence Code section 352 violate a defendant's constitutional rights? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a defendant's claim that the exclusion of evidence in the trial of a defendant in a sexual assault case violated his federal constitutional right to present a defense? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law in which a federal or state prosecutor has been found to have violated a defendant's right to due process? (California, United States of America)
How have courts treated a defendant's right to due process, equal protection and the federal and state constitutional prohibitions against excessive fines? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant's reliance on evidence code section 730 of the Evidence Code Section 730 a violation of his constitutional right to access a mental health expert? (California, United States of America)
Does admitting into evidence of volunteered statements by a defendant prior to his having been advised of his rights under the Federal Constitution violate such rights? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant's right to due process violated when evidence of a witness's identification of that defendant is admitted? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant be convicted of violating section 148(a)(1) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure if the jury found a completed violation of section 148 prior to the officers' use of excessive force? (California, United States of America)
