The following excerpt is from Walker ex rel. Themselves ex rel. Their Infant Children T.W. v. City of N.Y., No. 14-4576-cv (2nd Cir. 2015):
2. Though Plaintiffs maintain that the district court improperly dismissed their state law claims with prejudice, the district court's order belies this contention, as the court expressly declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over those claims. See van Emrik v. Chemung Cty. Dep't of Soc. Servs., 911 F.2d 863, 868 (2d Cir. 1990) ("Having rejected appellants' constitutional claims, [the district court] properly declined to exercise pendent jurisdiction over their state law claims, in effect, dismissing them without prejudice.").
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.