The following excerpt is from Wiideman v. Potter, 8 F.3d 34 (9th Cir. 1993):
2 Evidence that the defendant's allegedly retaliatory action took place immediately following the inmate's protected activity may allow an inference of retaliatory motive. Cf. Smith v. Maschner, 899 F.2d 940, 949 (10th Cir.1990).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.