Does a constructive amendment claim before the district court need to be reviewed de novo?
MultiRegion, United States of America
The following excerpt is from United States v. Davis, 854 F.3d 601 (9th Cir. 2017):
"When [as in this case] a defendant raises a constructive amendment claim before the district court, we review de novo." United States v. Ward , 747 F.3d 1184, 1188 (9th Cir. 2014).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Can a petitioner who has had a full and fair review of his Fourth Amendment claims in state court seek to have those claims reviewed by the federal appeals court? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
If a federal claim is not "adjudicated on the merits" in a state court, if the state court rejects the federal claim, what is the legal test for review of the claim? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When a final judgment from one district court is registered with another district court pursuant to Section 1963, is it treated like a judgment from the other district court? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does a district court abuse its discretion in denying leave to amend because any amendment premised on a promissory estoppel claim would have been futile? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When reviewing a finding of juror impartiality by a district court, what is the deference due to the district court? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does a claim that the district court erred by dismissing his Eighth Amendment claim because he did not allege that beef liver was nutritionally inadequate? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the basis for a federal district court's finding that a state court transcript is sufficient basis for the district court to grant a motion requiring an evidentiary hearing? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for reviewing a Fourth Amendment claim in circumstances where the petitioner has neither pleaded nor proved the denial of a full and fair opportunity to litigate that claim in state courts? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When reviewing a district court's confirmation of an arbitral award, does the court need to review a finding of fact for "clear error"? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for reviewing a Fourth Amendment claim in circumstances where the petitioner has neither pleaded nor proved the denial of a full and fair opportunity to litigate that claim in the state courts? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
