California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Kuehl, G043551, Super. Ct. No. 09HF0538 (Cal. App. 2011):
Because we find the jury was properly instructed, defendant's claim that his attorney was ineffective for failing to request the proposed clarifying instructions must also fail. "If a defendant has failed to show that the challenged actions of counsel were prejudicial, a reviewing court may reject the claim on that ground without determining whether counsel's performance was deficient. [Citation.]" (People v. Kipp (1998) 18 Cal.4th 349, 366-367.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.