Where the plaintiff’s injuries are caused by more than one tortfeasor, the liability for those injuries must be apportioned if the injuries are divisible as opposed to indivisible. Indivisible injuries are those that cannot be separated or have liability attributed to the constituent causes. Divisible injuries, in contrast, are those capable of being separated out and having their damages assessed independently: Bradley v. Groves, 2010 BCCA 361, paras. 19-20. The separation of distinct and divisible injuries is not truly apportionment but is a matter of causation: Athey, at para. 24.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.