British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from McArthur v. Hudson, 2012 BCSC 1293 (CanLII):
Another way of distinguishing pre-existing injuries from non-tortious causes are to consider whether any of the plaintiff’s injuries are “divisible injuries” capable of being separated out. Indivisible injuries are those that cannot be separated or have liability attributed to the constituent causes (Bradley v. Groves, 2010 BCCA 361, leave to appeal to SCC refused, [2010] S.C.C.A. No. 337 (April 14, 2011)).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.