In reviewing the Hearing Officer’s reasons and the alleged errors in his analysis we are to bear in mind that our role is not to second-guess the Hearing Officer, whose assessment of and weight given to the factors is entitled to deference. Also, none of the disposition factors are paramount over the others and the factors are intended to be “flexible, contextual and may evolve over time”: see Husseini v. York Regional Police Service, 2018 ONSC 283 (Div. Ct.).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.