How have courts directed hearing officers to not be overly critical of the language used by hearing officers?
Ontario, Canada
The following excerpt is from Nisbett v. Pluss, 2012 CanLII 102110 (ON CPC):
64. We have been directed by the Courts to not be overly critical of the language used by hearing officers as they are not legally trained, Galassi v. Hamilton Police Service (September 3, 2003, upheld [2005] O.J. No. 2301 (Div. Ct.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What considerations must be considered in determining the disposition of a hearing officer’s finding that the penalty imposed by the hearing officer was excessive? (Ontario, Canada)
How have the courts interpreted the principles of the Court of Arbitration for the purpose of making decisions at an arbitrator rather than the court? (Ontario, Canada)
Is there any evidence of any direct involvement of a hearing officer in any of the preceding events? (Ontario, Canada)
Does the Court of Appeal have jurisdiction to order a transfer of a cause into this court from another court? (Ontario, Canada)
Can a provincial superior court decline to hear an application for habeas corpus? (Ontario, Canada)
When can a corporation be represented in court by a sole director, officer and shareholder? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for enforcement of a request to obtain an order from a court in Canada from a foreign court? (Ontario, Canada)
Can a parent be found in contempt of court for passively permitting the court order to be undermined? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for directing a trial of the issues before the court? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the impact of a court's consideration of time spent preparing for, travelling to and attending court on a motion? (Ontario, Canada)
