In reviewing the Hearing Officer’s consideration of the remaining disposition factors, we are to bear in mind that our role is not to second-guess the Hearing Officer whose assessment of and weight given to the factors are entitled to deference. Also, none of the disposition factors are paramount over the others and they are intended to be “flexible, contextual and may evolve over time”: see Husseini v. York Regional Police Service, 2018 ONSC 283 (Div. Ct.).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.