Rule 9-1(4) of the Rules provides that the court may consider an offer to settle when exercising its discretion in relation to costs. In a proceeding in which an offer to settle has been made, Rule 9-1(5)(b) allows the court to award double costs of all or some of the steps taken in the proceeding after the date of delivery or service of the offer to settle. Such an award is a punitive measure against a litigant for their failure to accept an offer to settle that, in all of the circumstances, should have been accepted: Hartshorne v. Hartshorne, 2011 BCCA 29 at para. 25.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.