In sum, a court has very broad discretion under r. 9-1(6); that discretion, however, is not unfettered, and a court must exercise its discretion according to principle: Hartshorne at paras. 22-23; Paskall v. Scheithauer, 2014 BCCA 26 at para. 83. Indeed, while r. 9-1(6) of the Rules is clearly discretionary, as Goepel J. said (as he then was) in A.E. v. D.W.J., 2009 BCSC 505 at para. 62: …the defendant’s offer to settle cannot be ignored, because to do so would undermine the purpose of the Rule. Having decided to proceed in face of a not insignificant and ultimately successful offer to settle, the plaintiff cannot avoid some consequences.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.