This debate was resolved in A.E. v. D.W.J., 2009 BCSC 505, released on April 15, 2009 and subsequently affirmed in sub. nom. Evans v. Jensen, 2011 BCCA 279. The two options included in Rule 37B were held to be exhaustive. No order for single post-offer damages for a defendant could be made, because such an offer was not specified in Rule 37B(a) or (b).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.