This is not a situation of money being transferred within a family without clear and cogent evidence of an obligation to repay, of the kind referred to in the decision of Reilly J., relied upon by the applicant. (Close v. Close, [1977] O.J. No. 3288 (O.C.J.)). I have concluded, as did Reilly J. upon the facts before him, that the indebtedness has been established to the usual standard required between parties dealing at arm’s length, and, as well, that any presumption of advancement has been rebutted.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.