In cases involving soft tissue injuries and chronic pain with no medically objective findings, the plaintiff’s credibility as to her ability to function at work and at home is a paramount consideration. The plaintiff has the onus of satisfying the court on a balance of probabilities of her claim of pain and consequent losses, and that, but for the Accident, she would not have suffered the injuries she alleges: Clements v. Clements, 2012 SCC 32.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.