Beginning with the question of J.K.N.’s school enrollment, in a very comprehensive fashion, at ¶ 29-33 of Meyer v. Content, Chappel J. sets out the law respecting what is required for child support to be ordered based on an adult child’s enrollment in a “full time program of education”. While the new section 31 broadens the bases of entitlement to child support, I note that the amendment did not abandon the old statutory language about enrollment in a full time program of education in the predecessor to section 31. Therefore, the case law decided under the previous section remains applicable in cases where dependency flows from an adult child’s continued educational path.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.