[18] Another factor in deciding whether unilateral termination is available to the respondent husband is the existence of his obligation to support the child in the separation agreement. Surely on the basis of Spring v. Spring and the other authorities quoted, the respondent husband cannot argue change of settled intention to avoid an obligation of support contained in the agreement. I therefore find in this fact situation that the respondent husband cannot unilaterally change his intention and hence terminate his obligations.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.