California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Ravid v. Abrahami, B286939 (Cal. App. 2019):
Ravid has not shown that Abrahami's testimony was inherently improbable or physically impossible. Ravid has shown some conflicts in the testimony and raised some grounds for reasonable suspicion of some of Abrahami's testimony, but that
Page 15
does not justify the reversal of the judgment. (Bloxham v. Saldinger, supra, 228 Cal.App.4th at p. 750.)
2. Appellant Has Not Shown That Preclusive Sanctions Adversely Affected Her Case.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.