California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Stapke & Harris, LLP v. Raskov, B252176 (Cal. App. 2015):
and provide, among other things, "[a] brief narrative statement of the general substance of the testimony the expert is expected to give." (Code Civ. Proc., 2034.260, subd. (c)(2); see Bonds v. Roy (1999) 20 Cal.4th 140, 148.) If a party wishes to expand the scope of an expert's testimony beyond those topics identified in the declaration, it must successfully move for leave to amend its expert witness declaration. (Code Civ. Proc., 2034.610, subd. (a)(2); see Bonds, at p. 145.) Otherwise, expert opinion offered by any party who has "unreasonably failed" to comply with these requirements "shall be excluded." (Code Civ. Proc., 2034.300; see Bonds, at pp. 146-147.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.