Can an expert testify before the jury in a personal injury trial without disclosing their reasons for their opinion to the jury?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Perez, B284668 (Cal. App. 2019):

"A trial court has broad discretion to exclude relevant evidence under Evidence Code section 352 'if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the probability that its admission will (a) necessitate undue consumption of time or (b) create substantial danger of undue prejudice, of confusing the issues, or of misleading the jury.' [Citations.] Such 'discretion extends to the admission or exclusion of expert testimony.' [Citations.] We review rulings regarding relevancy and Evidence Code section 352 under an abuse of discretion standard." (People v. Linton (2013) 56 Cal.4th 1146, 1181.)

An expert witness may be fully cross-examined as to the matter upon which his or her opinion is based and the reasons for his or her opinion. (Evid. Code, 721, subd. (a); People v. Ledesma (2006) 39 Cal.4th 641, 695.) However, an expert "may not under the guise of stating reasons for an opinion bring before

Page 36

the jury incompetent hearsay evidence. [Citation.] A trial court has considerable discretion to control the form in which the expert is questioned to prevent the jury from learning of incompetent hearsay." (People v. Price (1991) 1 Cal.4th 324, 416.)

Other Questions


Does admission of an expert opinion without disclosing to the jury its entire hearsay basis implicates the constitutional right to jury trial? (California, United States of America)
Does the trial court instruct the jury on the limited admissibility of statements relied on by Edinger, the expert who gave evidence at trial on the basis of an expert opinion? (California, United States of America)
In a personal injury action, does plaintiff have to disclose in his witness exchange list or, in response to a request at a deposition, the substance of the facts and opinions to which the witness will testify at trial? (California, United States of America)
Is there a reasonable likelihood that the jury was misled by the standard instruction given to the jury in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
Can an expert testify about their reasons for their opinions before a jury? (California, United States of America)
What is the "reasonable person" standard in determining whether a person is a reasonable person? (California, United States of America)
What is the legal test for a jury in a personal injury case where the jury was asked to read the jury's instructions? (California, United States of America)
Does a jury's misconduct in a jury trial prejudice a defendant who refused to take the witness stand because the jury did not want to hear from him? (California, United States of America)
In a personal injury case, can a plaintiff hire an attorney to prosecute the personal injury suit? (California, United States of America)
Does a jury's misconduct in a jury trial prejudice a defendant who refused to take the witness stand because the jury did not want to hear from him? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.