Can a rational trier of fact have found the essential elements of the crime beyond reasonable doubt?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Castiblanco, B284319 (Cal. App. 2019):
rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.' [Citation.] In so doing, a reviewing court 'presumes in support of the judgment the existence of every fact the trier could reasonably deduce from the evidence.' [Citation.] The same standard of review applies to the sufficiency of the evidence supporting special circumstance findings. [Citation.]" (People v. Edwards (2013) 57 Cal.4th 658, 715.)
2. Analysis
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is there any case law in which a jury has found that any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for establishing that a rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime proven beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard for determining whether a rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
Are satisfied that "any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt"? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard for determining whether a reasonable trier of fact could have found the essential elements of a crime beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
Can a rational trier of fact have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of crime beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
Can a reasonable trier of fact have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for establishing that a rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of a crime proven beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of a crime beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
