Can a rational trier of fact have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt?

rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt."' [Citation.] We must presume in support of the judgment the existence of every fact that the trier of fact could reasonably deduce from the evidence. [Citation.] 'The focus of the substantial evidence test is on the whole record of evidence presented to the trier of fact, rather than on "'isolated bits of evidence.'" [Citation.]' [Citation.]" (People v. Medina (2009) 46 Cal.4th 913, 919.)