What is the test for determining whether a rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of a crime beyond a reasonable doubt?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Hill, D073931 (Cal. App. 2020):
or inherently improbable. (People v. Young (2005) 34 Cal.4th 1149, 1181.) " '[T]he relevant question is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.' " (People v. Hatch (2000) 22 Cal.4th 260, 272, italics omitted.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for determining whether a rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of crime beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard for determining whether a rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard for determining whether a reasonable trier of fact could have found the essential elements of a crime beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law in which a jury has found that any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for establishing that a rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of a crime proven beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for establishing that a rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime proven beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
Are satisfied that "any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt"? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a reasonable trier of fact could have found defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
Can a reasonable trier of fact have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a reasonable trier of fact could have found defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
