Can a jury find a defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a case involving masturbation?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Cockerham, G049786 (Cal. App. 2015):
reasonable trier of fact could find a defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. (People v. Tully (2012) 54 Cal.4th 952, 1006-1007.) It was reasonable for the jury to infer that defendant, with a history of indecent exposure, exposed himself indecently when engaging in masturbation.
4. Sufficient evidence supports defendant's conviction of misdemeanor loitering and misdemeanor peeking.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for determining whether a reasonable jury could have found a defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a reasonable trier of fact could find a defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a reasonable trier of fact could have found defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the relevant inquiry in determining whether a reasonable trier of fact could have found a defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a reasonable trier of fact could have found defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether there is substantial evidence by which a reasonable trier of fact could find a defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
Is there any reasonable doubt that there would have been no reasonable doubt in a jury finding a defendant guilty absent the error? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a reasonable trier of fact could have found defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a reasonable trier of fact could have found a defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
Does the doctrine of reasonable doubt apply to a defendant's due process right to appeal against a jury verdict that diminished the prosecution's burden to prove beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
