Can a court take judicial notice of a factual finding made in another action?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Tuzzolino v. Fed. Nat'l Mortg. Ass'n, E068822 (Cal. App. 2018):
Thus, while a court can take judicial notice that a court made a particular ruling, it cannot take judicial notice of the truth of a factual finding made in another action." (People v. Moore (1997) 59 Cal.App.4th 168, 178.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
In a personal injury action brought by a former wife against her ex-partner in a civil action, in addition to a similar action against the husband in a separate action, can the court order return to husband in the civil action? (California, United States of America)
Can a judge take judicial notice of factual findings of a trial court? (California, United States of America)
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, does the appellate court have power to substitute its factual determination for that factual determination? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will Flores appeal the Court's finding that Flores has failed to provide any factual or legal basis supporting its cause of action? (California, United States of America)
When reviewing a challenge to a suppression ruling, how does the Court of Appeal review the factual findings of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
Can a reviewing court overturn a factual finding made by a trial court? (California, United States of America)
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, can the appellate court substitute its deductions for those of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
What are the findings of the Court of Appeal at the Superior Court of Justice on Beach's appeal against a finding that an autopsy photograph of the victim was unduly prejudicial and lacked probative value? (California, United States of America)
In reviewing a motion to suppress evidence, does the court defer to the factual findings of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
Whether a court's ruling is based on oral testimony or written declarations, when conflicting inferences can reasonably be drawn from the facts, can the appellate court defer to the trial court's factual determinations? (California, United States of America)
