In what circumstances will the court focus on the payor's income and assets that have not been included in the equalization or division of matrimonial assets?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Murphy v. Murphy, 2015 BCSC 408 (CanLII):
To avoid double recovery, the court should, where practicable, focus on that portion of the payor’s income and assets that have not been part of the equalization or division of matrimonial assets when the payee spouse’s continuing need for support is shown. Boston is a reference to Boston v. Boston, 2001 SCC 43.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
In what circumstances will the court order a division of assets in the absence of an equal division? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will the court award equal division of family assets in a long-term marriage? (British Columbia, Canada)
When a spouse's assets are not family assets, is one of the spouses entitled to an equal division of assets? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances have courts awarded special costs in family law cases where a party deliberately misled the court about income and marital assets? (British Columbia, Canada)
If a husband and wife have equalized their assets, is it necessary to divide the assets equalized so that the husband can continue to receive child and spousal support? (British Columbia, Canada)
How has the court treated the issue of division and division of assets in a custody and maintenance case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the implications of a husband's claim that his wife’s income and assets are equal to that of his assets? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will a payor be asked to use assets that were equalized as between the parties to pay support to the payee spouse? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will a trial court order permanent spousal support for the payor husband, even if the husband’s income is uncertain? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can the circumstances of the parties into their 70’s and 80s be considered equalized in the context of equalization of income between the parties in their 70s and 90s? (British Columbia, Canada)
