It is my opinion that in all the circumstances, the bank is entitled to costs to be assessed on the solicitor-and-client scale. The reason for this, as was explained in one of the earlier cases in the bankruptcy court on the predecessor of s. 38, is that a creditor successfully assuming carriage of an action under that section ought to be entitled to solicitor-and-client costs because he has salvaged an asset which would otherwise have been lost: see Coursolles v. Fookes (1889), 16 O.R. 691 (H.C.J.). I agree with what was said by Ferguson J. in that decision and therefore will allow the bank the costs of these proceedings (other than costs awarded by Lissaman J.) on the solicitor-and-client scale.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.