What constitutes a breach of natural justice when a tribunal refuses to admit evidence that is relevant and crucial to a party's case?
New Brunswick, Canada
The following excerpt is from Fortis Properties and Irving et al. v. United Steelworkers of America, 2006 NBQB 260 (CanLII):
Where a tribunal refuses to admit evidence that is relevant and crucial to a party's case, the refusal amounts to a breach of natural justice. See: Sydicat des employes professionnels de l'Université du Québec é Trois-Rivires v. Laroque, supra.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
In what circumstances will the court allow evidence to be admitted in a civil case where the accused's right to silence was violated by the police? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What is the relevant case law on counts #2 and #2 of sexual assault allegations? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What is the evidence supporting the allegation that there was no safe avenue of escape for the accused in the assault case? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What is the relevance of the evidence at trial for possession of stolen property? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What is the difference between the original evidence and the current evidence? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What is the difference between a learned justice and learned justice? (New Brunswick, Canada)
Can a failure of natural justice be cured at the appellate level? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What are the alternative pleas in a claim for breach of contract, negligence and breach of fiduciary duties arising out of a solicitor-client relationship? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What are the factors used to determine whether a plaintiff has a duty of fairness or natural justice? (New Brunswick, Canada)
Is there any case law or case law that would allow for a "mini trial" to supplement the record? (New Brunswick, Canada)
