Is there any case law or case law that would allow for a "mini trial" to supplement the record?
New Brunswick, Canada
The following excerpt is from Savard-Nash v. Kenny, 2018 NBQB 131 (CanLII):
Finally, there has been no request from either party for a so-called “mini trial” regarding any aspect of the evidence in order to supplement the record (See: Rule 22.04 (3) and O’Toole v. Peterson, supra at para. 72)).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for admissible source records in a sexual assault case? (New Brunswick, Canada)
Can evidence obtained in a manner that infringed any rights guaranteed by the Charter be excluded from the trial? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a plaintiff would have suffered a secondary injury if they had not suffered the primary injury? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What is the impact of the pleadings on the outcome of the trial? (New Brunswick, Canada)
On what basis has a court ever allowed a tribunal to exercise its own jurisdiction? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What is the evidentiary record of a motion under Rule 23.01(1)(b)? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What is the relevance of the evidence at trial for possession of stolen property? (New Brunswick, Canada)
In what circumstances will the court allow evidence to be admitted in a civil case where the accused's right to silence was violated by the police? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What is the test for failing to keep an adequate records of an employee? (New Brunswick, Canada)
Are telephone records that are in the nature of a summary? (New Brunswick, Canada)
