The plaintiffs also refer R v. Oland [2015] N.B.J. No. 313 where telephone records were admitted that were in the nature of a summary. I think that case is distinguishable, however, because those telephone records, while they may have been summaries, were admitted because they were generated in the normal course of business the same way the original data in that case had been recorded. They were not summaries in the sense that we are dealing with in this case.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.