The plaintiff further states that the clinical records meet the requirement of necessity and are, therefore, admissible even without calling the doctor, because the doctor would have no independent memory of his treatment of the patient and would have to rely on his clinical records if called to testify (see: Ares v. Venner, supra).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.